Rather, the problem is that they simply don’t offer adequate gaming performance when you consider the attached price tag.įor example, the Radeon Pro 5500M that you’ll find in the $2800 16-inch MacBook Pro has worse gaming performance than the budget-oriented GTX 1650 Super whose MSRP is a mere $150. The same goes for the Vega-equipped iMac Pro and Mac Pro configurations: they are simply too expensive for the kind of performance that they offer as far as gaming is concerned. Now, it’s not that all of those GPUs perform terribly. In turn, the more powerful ones that are marketed towards professionals come with Radeon Pro GPUs, which are hardly good fits for gaming. In the cases of weaker, more affordable Macs, their GPUs are mainly Intel’s Iris Plus graphics solutions. Games, however, aren’t exactly being optimized to run on Macs.
However, the truth is, even the weakest Macs work quite well thanks to excellent software optimization. Some would even say that they are now putting form before function. Needless to say, all of Apple’s Macs start at “expensive” and go as high as “extremely expensive.” Many of them pack some excellent hardware, so why aren’t they good for gaming? The Hardware And The SoftwareĪs mentioned in the introduction, Apple’s computers have focused a lot on form for a good while now. Finally, there are the regular desktop setups: the basic but compact Mac mini and the beastly new Mac Pro. Then, we have the “all-in-one” desktop solutions: the iMac and iMac Pro. At the moment, Apple sells three MacBook products: the MacBook Air, a laptop geared towards the more casual user, as well as two MacBook Pro variants: a 13-inch and a 16-inch model. Macs come in both laptop and desktop forms.
0 kommentar(er)
